{"id":1029,"date":"2004-09-10T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-09-10T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/blogs\/bobb\/post\/Office-2003-XML-schemas-and-SQL-Server-2005.aspx"},"modified":"2013-02-22T18:41:57","modified_gmt":"2013-02-23T02:41:57","slug":"office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/","title":{"rendered":"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nAfter lots of interesting (but fruitful) experiences with the XQuery engine in SQL Server 2005, I decided that I'd rather have an XML schema collection for everything than put [1] (that's the numeric predicate meaning "item 1 using 1-based ordinals") everywhere in the XQuery that I needed a singleton. It's a good idea to use "typed XML" anyway. Dan Sullivan<\/a> thought a good non-trivial use-case would be Office 2003 docs and went forth to create SQL Server 2005 XML schema collections from the publically available schema documents<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\nFirst thing he ran into is that specifying processContents="lax" now causes an error when cataloging the XML schema collection. It used to catalog without error and then use processContents="skip" behavior instead in beta1. The Office schemas use this construct, so he's created some code to change it to processContents="skip" so SQL Server 2005 would "like" it. We've run into a couple more cataloging problems, repeated attributes on the same element, etc… Wonder where you report Office schema problems.\n<\/p>\n

\nIf you're wondering what this is about technically, pulling out my favorite XML Quick Reference (by Aaron and Gudge), they define processContents (on xsd:any or xsd:anyAttribute) as "Specifies whether a schema processor should validate the elements\/attributes appearing in place of the wildcard". The default is "strict", meaning validate them. Lax means the schema processor *should* (but is not required to) validate if schema information is available. Skip means a schema processor should not validate these.\n<\/p>\n

\nBTW guys, when's Essential XML Quick Reference Volume 2 due out? There *lot's* more specs now. Maybe you could publish an Essential XML Reference Encyclopedia?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After lots of interesting (but fruitful) experiences with the XQuery engine in SQL Server 2005, I decided that I'd rather have an XML schema collection for everything than put [1] (that's the numeric predicate meaning "item 1 using 1-based ordinals") everywhere in the XQuery that I needed a singleton. It's a good idea to use "typed XML" anyway. Dan […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sql-server-2005","category-sql-server-xml"],"yoast_head":"\nOffice 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"After lots of interesting (but fruitful) experiences with the XQuery engine in SQL Server 2005, I decided that I'd rather have an XML schema collection for everything than put [1] (that's the numeric predicate meaning "item 1 using 1-based ordinals") everywhere in the XQuery that I needed a singleton. It's a good idea to use "typed XML" anyway. Dan […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Bob Beauchemin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-09-10T19:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-02-23T02:41:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bob Beauchemin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bob Beauchemin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/\",\"name\":\"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-09-10T19:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-02-23T02:41:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/62bfa986c5b5d28fcffd8b4fc409c73e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SQL Server 2005\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/category\/sql-server-2005\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/\",\"name\":\"Bob Beauchemin\",\"description\":\"SQL Server Blog\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/62bfa986c5b5d28fcffd8b4fc409c73e\",\"name\":\"Bob Beauchemin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6f80e6cc667410857fa6a21931dc528b8092f4d112bf7a8ff7c267674d44ee37?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6f80e6cc667410857fa6a21931dc528b8092f4d112bf7a8ff7c267674d44ee37?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bob Beauchemin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/author\/bobb\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin","og_description":"After lots of interesting (but fruitful) experiences with the XQuery engine in SQL Server 2005, I decided that I'd rather have an XML schema collection for everything than put [1] (that's the numeric predicate meaning "item 1 using 1-based ordinals") everywhere in the XQuery that I needed a singleton. It's a good idea to use "typed XML" anyway. Dan […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/","og_site_name":"Bob Beauchemin","article_published_time":"2004-09-10T19:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-02-23T02:41:57+00:00","author":"Bob Beauchemin","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bob Beauchemin","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/","name":"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005 - Bob Beauchemin","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-09-10T19:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2013-02-23T02:41:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/62bfa986c5b5d28fcffd8b4fc409c73e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/office-2003-xml-schemas-and-sql-server-2005\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SQL Server 2005","item":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/category\/sql-server-2005\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Office 2003 XML schemas and SQL Server 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/","name":"Bob Beauchemin","description":"SQL Server Blog","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/62bfa986c5b5d28fcffd8b4fc409c73e","name":"Bob Beauchemin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6f80e6cc667410857fa6a21931dc528b8092f4d112bf7a8ff7c267674d44ee37?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6f80e6cc667410857fa6a21931dc528b8092f4d112bf7a8ff7c267674d44ee37?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bob Beauchemin"},"sameAs":["http:\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/author\/bobb\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1029\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sqlskills.com\/blogs\/bobb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}