Warning: Constant WP_TEMP_DIR already defined in /var/www/html/blogs/joe/wp-config.php on line 93

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/blogs/joe/wp-config.php:93) in /var/www/html/blogs/joe/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: SEQUENCE Object versus Modulus Hash Partitioning https://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/joe/sequence-object-versus-modulus-hash-partitioning/ SQL Server Performance Tuning, High Availability and Disaster Recovery Blog Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:32:29 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Eric Humphrey https://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/joe/sequence-object-versus-modulus-hash-partitioning/#comment-625 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:03:33 +0000 /blogs/joe/post/SEQUENCE-Object-versus-Modulus-Hash-Partitioning.aspx#comment-625 Thanks Joe. So the upshot is we can do this in versions prior to 2012. The downside is the computed column, since it is persisted, takes up additional space.

]]> By: Lee https://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/joe/sequence-object-versus-modulus-hash-partitioning/#comment-624 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:22:03 +0000 /blogs/joe/post/SEQUENCE-Object-versus-Modulus-Hash-Partitioning.aspx#comment-624 Interesting.. I wonder how that compares to simple row_number().

Try increasing the cache size to 11 on the sequence and throw on a (tablockx) on the insert !

]]>