Survey: how much server memory on your largest machine?

[Edit 12/10/14: Survey is closed see the editorial here.]
One of the trends I’m seeing this year is a slow increase in the number of people who have servers with very large amounts of memory – so time for a survey!

I’d like to know how much memory is installed on your largest server that runs SQL Server (not what max server memory is set to, how much physical memory is installed).

I’ll editorialize the results in a week or two.


PS If you can’t see the vote button, it’s a browser issue so please try a different one or just hit ‘Enter’ after making a selection and it should register your vote.

Capturing wait statistics for a period of time

In both my wait statistics pre-conference workshops at the PASS Summit and SQLintersection I promised to do a bunch of blog posts. The first one on the list is a simple script to allow you to capture all the waits that occurred over a period of time.

The script does the following:

  • Creates two temporary tables
  • Captures the output from sys.dm_os_wait_stats into the first table
  • Waits for a configurable delay (line 41 in the script – I made it 30 minutes in the example)
  • Captures the output from sys.dm_os_wait_stats into the second table
  • Provides my usual wait stats output on the results


  File:     ShortPeriodWaitStats.sql

  Summary:  Short snapshot of wait stats

  SQL Server Versions: 2005 onwards
  Written by Paul S. Randal,

  (c) 2014, All rights reserved.

  For more scripts and sample code, check out

  You may alter this code for your own *non-commercial* purposes (e.g. in a
  for-sale commercial tool). Use in your own environment is encouraged.
  You may republish altered code as long as you include this copyright and
  give due credit, but you must obtain prior permission before blogging
  this code.


IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [tempdb].[sys].[objects]
    WHERE [name] = N'##SQLskillsStats1')
    DROP TABLE [##SQLskillsStats1];

IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [tempdb].[sys].[objects]
    WHERE [name] = N'##SQLskillsStats2')
    DROP TABLE [##SQLskillsStats2];

SELECT [wait_type], [waiting_tasks_count], [wait_time_ms],
       [max_wait_time_ms], [signal_wait_time_ms]
INTO ##SQLskillsStats1
FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats;

WAITFOR DELAY '00:30:00';

SELECT [wait_type], [waiting_tasks_count], [wait_time_ms],
       [max_wait_time_ms], [signal_wait_time_ms]
INTO ##SQLskillsStats2
FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats;

WITH [DiffWaits] AS
-- Waits that weren't in the first snapshot
    FROM [##SQLskillsStats2] AS [ts2]
    LEFT OUTER JOIN [##SQLskillsStats1] AS [ts1]
        ON [ts2].[wait_type] = [ts1].[wait_type]
    WHERE [ts1].[wait_type] IS NULL
    AND [ts2].[wait_time_ms] > 0
-- Diff of waits in both snapshots
        [ts2].[wait_time_ms] - [ts1].[wait_time_ms] AS [wait_time_ms],
        [ts2].[signal_wait_time_ms] - [ts1].[signal_wait_time_ms] AS [signal_wait_time_ms],
        [ts2].[waiting_tasks_count] - [ts1].[waiting_tasks_count] AS [waiting_tasks_count]
    FROM [##SQLskillsStats2] AS [ts2]
    LEFT OUTER JOIN [##SQLskillsStats1] AS [ts1]
        ON [ts2].[wait_type] = [ts1].[wait_type]
    WHERE [ts1].[wait_type] IS NOT NULL
    AND [ts2].[waiting_tasks_count] - [ts1].[waiting_tasks_count] > 0
    AND [ts2].[wait_time_ms] - [ts1].[wait_time_ms] > 0),
[Waits] AS
        [wait_time_ms] / 1000.0 AS [WaitS],
        ([wait_time_ms] - [signal_wait_time_ms]) / 1000.0 AS [ResourceS],
        [signal_wait_time_ms] / 1000.0 AS [SignalS],
        [waiting_tasks_count] AS [WaitCount],
        100.0 * [wait_time_ms] / SUM ([wait_time_ms]) OVER() AS [Percentage],
        ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY [wait_time_ms] DESC) AS [RowNum]
    FROM [DiffWaits]
    WHERE [wait_type] NOT IN (
        N'BROKER_TASK_STOP',            N'BROKER_TO_FLUSH',
        N'CHKPT',                       N'CLR_AUTO_EVENT',
        N'CLR_MANUAL_EVENT',            N'CLR_SEMAPHORE',
        N'EXECSYNC',                    N'FSAGENT',
        N'HADR_TIMER_TASK',             N'HADR_WORK_QUEUE',
        N'KSOURCE_WAKEUP',              N'LAZYWRITER_SLEEP',
        N'LOGMGR_QUEUE',                N'ONDEMAND_TASK_QUEUE',
        N'SLEEP_SYSTEMTASK',            N'SLEEP_TASK',
        N'WAITFOR',                     N'WAITFOR_TASKSHUTDOWN',
    [W1].[wait_type] AS [WaitType],
    CAST ([W1].[WaitS] AS DECIMAL (16, 2)) AS [Wait_S],
    CAST ([W1].[ResourceS] AS DECIMAL (16, 2)) AS [Resource_S],
    CAST ([W1].[SignalS] AS DECIMAL (16, 2)) AS [Signal_S],
    [W1].[WaitCount] AS [WaitCount],
    CAST ([W1].[Percentage] AS DECIMAL (5, 2)) AS [Percentage],
    CAST (([W1].[WaitS] / [W1].[WaitCount]) AS DECIMAL (16, 4)) AS [AvgWait_S],
    CAST (([W1].[ResourceS] / [W1].[WaitCount]) AS DECIMAL (16, 4)) AS [AvgRes_S],
    CAST (([W1].[SignalS] / [W1].[WaitCount]) AS DECIMAL (16, 4)) AS [AvgSig_S]
FROM [Waits] AS [W1]
INNER JOIN [Waits] AS [W2]
    ON [W2].[RowNum] <= [W1].[RowNum]
GROUP BY [W1].[RowNum], [W1].[wait_type], [W1].[WaitS],
    [W1].[ResourceS], [W1].[SignalS], [W1].[WaitCount], [W1].[Percentage]
HAVING SUM ([W2].[Percentage]) - [W1].[Percentage] < 95; -- percentage threshold

-- Cleanup
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [tempdb].[sys].[objects]
    WHERE [name] = N'##SQLskillsStats1')
    DROP TABLE [##SQLskillsStats1];

IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [tempdb].[sys].[objects]
    WHERE [name] = N'##SQLskillsStats2')
    DROP TABLE [##SQLskillsStats2];

August 2015 London IE1/IEPTO-1 class open for registration

Through popular demand we’ve managed to juggle some of our schedule around and found space to fit in our only class of 2015 in the UK, and it’s open for registration!

We’ll be teaching our signature IEPTO-1 (formerly IE1) Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization.

The class will be August 24-28, and we’ve got a discount for registering in 2014 and a discount for prior students:

  • Regular price is US$3,995
  • Early-bird price is US$3,295 for registrations in 2014 (increasing to $3,495 in 2015)
  • Prior student special price is US$3,195 for registration at any time

Sneak preview: we’ll likely be bringing IEPTO2 to Dublin in October 2015, through our lovely friends at ProData.

You can get all the details on the class page here.

We hope to see you there!

How to answer questions politely and correctly

Back in August I wrote a long post about how to ask questions politely and correctly to address what I see as a growing volume of poorly asked questions by people who often don’t have the common courtesy to be polite and also often come across as feeling entitled to an answer. Based on the responses, and private discussions, many of you out there see the same trend and are dismayed by it.

This is the necessary corollary to that post – how to answer questions politely and correctly, in my opinion – because I see people being discourteous and sometimes unprofessional in their replies. I’ve woven in some of the replies and private distribution list discussions I’ve had over the last two months as well – thanks to those involved – you know who you are.

I’ll start out by saying that some of you will disagree with elements of what I state below. That’s cool, this is just my opinion – vive la différence, and all that – but don’t expect to convince me to change my views. We’ll agree to disagree :-)

Ignorance is Not Stupidity

Probably the number one sin I see people committing when answering questions is giving an attitude to the original poster (who I’ll call the OP from now on) that they’re stupid/lacking/deficient/lazy in some way for not knowing the answer themselves.

Now, if a simple Google search would have found the answer, then I can understand some frustration on the part of the answerer, and I suffer from it myself, but that’s no excuse to be rude or belittling. I even shy away from posting Let Me Google That For You links in such cases as I think that comes across as too snarky, and I like to stay polite as much as I can. But sometimes I’ll just post a Google search URL (especially on Twitter), which does the same thing, but without the added snark, as that would just make me look angry. Others disagree with this sentiment, I know, and will happily post LMGTFY links – each to his/her own.

If it’s not a simple Google search, or I can tell from the question that the OP wouldn’t know what to search on, or how to make sense of the search results, or know which one to choose, then I’ll answer politely and explain the answer. Even if it’s something really simple about SQL Server. (Also check out the insightful comments about Google searches in the comment from @sqlhandle.)

As I explained in my post Ignorance is not stupidity back in 2011, everyone in the world starts with zero knowledge about SQL Server. I knew zero about SQL Server when I joined Microsoft from DEC in February 1999 (15 years ago – OMG – I’m getting old!! :-). Especially if the OP is someone you don’t know, give them the benefit of the doubt and treat them with respect for having the guts to ask a question publicly to get help. Don’t slap someone down for not knowing the answer. That’s the height of conceit, it’s bullying, and it’ll likely drive the OP away from our wonderful online SQL Server community.

Ok – that’s one of my hot-button topics done.

Posting Links in Question Answers

Here’s another one: posting links in question answers.

There was an interesting debate on the MVP email list a week or so ago about this, where someone said they hesitate to post blog post links as an answer because it can come across as self-promotion. I vehemently argued against that point of view, and I continue to believe that posting blog post links in the answer (or even as the answer) is entirely justified.

Self-promotion is where you’re posting something solely to get clicks on a link, or to drive traffic to your website for some business purpose – which of course is bad and you shouldn’t do it in the answer to a technical question – unless it’s directly relevant in some way. Posting a link to a blog post that contains the answer that the OP needs, or helps explain the answer, is certainly not self promotion. It doesn’t matter that the link is to a blog post on your company website, that’s just where you blog, and if it makes them aware of your company, then I think that’s fair recompense for your time in answering a community question. it’s not blatant self-promotion.

I also don’t buy the argument that a bunch of the contents of said blog post should be reiterated in the answer, just to give some meat to the answer in the thread so the thread is ‘self-contained’, or because blog posts move. One of the reasons I blog about things is so I can reference them in classes and online, so I can avoid repeating myself and point people at a deeper reference as part of answer, or as the complete answer. This is especially important for question mediums like Twitter.

If in doubt, consult whatever guidelines exist for the forum/distribution list/medium on which you’re answering. And if I just drop in a blog post link, I’ll always say something like ‘If you have any follow-up questions, feel free to ask’.

Now, saying that, you need to be very confident that your blog post is actually correct and actually answers the question (or contributes to your answer).

Answering the Actual Question

Which brings me to my next point: make sure you’re answering the actual question.

Often I see someone post an answer to the question that shows that either a) they didn’t read the question to see what the OP was actually asking for, or b) they didn’t understand the question or what the OP was actually asking for.

This is quite prevalent on forums such as MSDN, where I’ll see people post just for the sake of posting to try to increase their forums points/score. This is just daft. What’s really interesting is that I don’t see this behavior at all on #sqlhelp, as the only merit gained from answering questions on Twitter is community respect, not some silly score. Other forums do it better by allowing up and down voting, which increases of decreases your score. I applaud people who answer lots of questions correctly, but if you’re only doing it to have a higher score than everyone else, then IMHO you need to go out and get a life.

Don’t post at all if you don’t know the answer and can’t help, otherwise you’re just noise that’s obscuring the answer for the OP and putting people off from following and helping out in that forum. This is what stopped me answering corruption questions on MSDN and other forums – having to continually (nicely) correct people who were answering incorrectly and then being berated for it.

If there isn’t enough information in the question to answer it correctly, ask for more information. Don’t just assume. Or maybe give a couple of different answers, for different conditions or SQL Server versions, state as much, and ask for clarification. If you assume some piece of information that can change the answer, you may be doing a huge disservice to the OP by giving them an answer that’s wrong for their situation.

Don’t just answer: It Depends.

Much of the time the answer really does start with It Depends, but you then need to explain why it depends, what it depends, how it depends, etc. It Depends is a valid start to an answer IMHO. See my post It Depends. It really, really does for more on this.

If you don’t have time to answer properly, don’t answer at all. A half answer, or a non-answer wastes everyone’s time. Step away and let someone else answer.

If the medium where the question is being asked isn’t appropriate to the question, direct the OP at an alternative medium. For instance, if someone posts a #sqlhelp question on Twitter asking for an explanation of whether to use one join type or another, or a comparison between mirroring and availability groups based on some facet of operation, they’ll be directed by someone to post the question on a forum so that longer answers can be given.


It all comes down to this: give a good answer, that answers the question, provides references if necessary, and leaves the OP feeling like they’ve had a good interaction with the SQL Server community.

Even if they don’t ask politely or correctly, don’t be a jerk when you answer. You can politely point out how to ask the question. The days of being able to hide anonymously on the Internet are well past – and your response is captured for all eternity, so take pride in answering politely and correctly.

Again, don’t be a jerk. Treat people with respect, and if they seem to be lacking in some way, educate them. But be nice about it.


February 2015 Sydney IE2/IEPTO-2 class open for registration

We’ve managed to juggle some of our schedule around and found space to fit in our only class of 2015 in Australia, and it’s open for registration!

We’ll be bringing Jonathan and Erin with us to Sydney to teach our signature IEPTO-2 (formerly IE2) Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization.

The class will be February 23-27, and we’ve got a deep discount for prior students who’ve taken our IE1/IEPTO-1 class:

  • Regular price is US$3,995
  • Early-bird price is US$3,495 for registrations in 2014
  • Prior student special price is US$2,750

We’ll be giving registration priority to prior students as this is the only class we’ll be teaching in Australia in 2015, due to our schedule constraints.

You can get all the details on the class page here.

We hope to see you there!

Correctly adding data files to tempdb

It’s well known that one of the common performance issues that can affect tempdb is allocation bitmap contention. I discuss this, and ways to alleviate it, in these posts:

The current best advice around adding tempdb data files is enshrined in KB article 2154845. If you’re seeing tempdb allocation contention (see top blog post link above), then:

  • If your server has less than 8 logical cores (e.g. a one CPU server with 4 physical cores and hyperthreading enabled has 8 logical cores), use # tempdb data files = # logical cores, equally sized
  • If your server has more than 8 logical cores, start with 8 tempdb data files, and add sets of four at a time, equally sized, until the contention is alleviated

There are three problems that people often face when adding tempdb data files: matching the size of the existing files that are growing, adding a file doesn’t help with contention, and adding too many files.

Matching Existing File Sizes

This problem occurs when the existing tempdb data files are growing, and people find it hard to create additional files that match the size of the existing files.

There’s an easy method for doing this: don’t!

Don’t try to match the size of existing, growing files. Create the new files to be a bit larger than the existing files, then go back and increase the size of the existing files to match the size of the new files.

For example, if I have 4 tempdb data files sized at 6GB each, and they’re growing by 512MB every few minutes because of an ad hoc workload. If I decide to add 4 more files, I might decide to add the four new files at 10GB each, and then go back and do ALTER DATABASE [mydb] MODIFY FILE [DataFileX] (SIZE = 10GB) for each of the 4 existing files. Problem solved.

But also see the bottom section, where you may want to limit the total amount of space taken up by all your tempdb files if the only reason for extra files is to alleviate tempdb allocation contention.

Additionally, if you have one full data file, you may find that…

Adding a File Doesn’t Help

This is very frustrating when it happens to people because it gives the impression that adding tempdb data files does not help with allocation contention. However, there is a simple explanation for this phenomenon.

Consider the case where there is one tempdb data file. Obviously all the allocations have to come from that data file and with the right workload, allocation bitmap contention will result. After the server has been up for a while, and the workload has been running and using tempdb for a while, the single tempdb data file may become quite full.

Now let’s say that you decide to add one more tempdb data file. What happens to the allocations?

Allocation uses two algorithms: round-robin and proportional fill. It will try to allocate from each file in the filegroup in turn, but will allocate proportionally more frequently from files that have proportionally more free space than others in the filegroup.

In the case where one file is very full and the other file is very empty, the vast majority of the allocations will be from the new, empty file. This means that almost all the contention moves from the initially existing tempdb data file to the new one, without much alleviation of the overall contention.

If this happens to you, try adding some more data files so that the allocation system has multiple files that it will allocate from, spreading the contention over those files and leading to an overall drop in contention and increase in transaction throughput.

But beware of immediately…

Adding Too Many Data Files

This is the case where tempdb allocation contention is a problem and people immediately add a large number of additional files where fewer files would work just as well. The problem here is that additional disk space is used up for no real gain, which may or may not be significant in your environment, depending on the size of the files added.

Let’s do an experiment. Below is a screen shot of PerfMon measuring transactions per second in tempdb for a contrived workload that has 100 connections all repeatedly creating and truncating temp tables. It’s running on my laptop (8 logical cores) using SQL Server 2014 RTM CU3.

perfmon1 Correctly adding data files to tempdb

For the first third of the trace, there’s a single data file. For the middle third of the trace, there are two equally-sized files. For the final third of the trace, there are 8 equally-sized files.

Clearly there isn’t a big performance boost from having the additional 6 data files in the final third, but what’s the sweet spot?

Ideally you’d experiment with varying numbers of tempdb data files to find the sweet spot for your workload. However, that’s easier said than done, especially when you’re trying to standardize a tempdb configuration across multiple servers.

Here’s an example of a slightly different workload running under the same conditions on my laptop.

perfmon2 Correctly adding data files to tempdb

It starts with a single data file, then 2, 4, 6, and 8 (pausing perfmon between each file addition). In this case, it’s clearly worth it going to 8 data files. But would I make them all the same size as the initial data file?

No, not if the only reason I need the extra files is to alleviate the allocation bitmap contention. I’d lower the size of all the tempdb files, including the initial one, so I’m not taking up a huge amount of extra disk space for these files.

Just be aware that sometimes you don’t need to go all out and add a whole bunch of extra tempdb data files to get a performance boost.


The easiest way to alleviate tempdb allocation contention is to enable trace flag 1118 and to add more tempdb data files. Just be careful that you add the right number to help with the contention, you make all the files the same size, and that you take into account the total size of all the data files you’ve created, and possibly dial them all down a bit.


2015 Chicago and Bellevue classes open for registration

I’ve just released our first sets of US classes for 2015 for registration!

Our classes in April/May will be in Chicago, IL:

  • IE0: Immersion Event for Junior/Accidental DBAs
    • April 27-29 (US$125 discount for registering in 2014)
  • IEPTO1: Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization – Part 1
    • April 27 – May 1 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)
  • IEPTO2: Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization – Part 2
    • May 4-8 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)
  • IEBI: Immersion Event on Business Intelligence
    • May 4-8 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)
  • IEHADR: Immersion Event on High Availability and Disaster Recovery
    • May 11-15 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)

Our classes in June will be in Bellevue, WA:

  • IEPTO1: Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization – Part 1
    • June 8-12 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)
  • IEPTO2: Immersion Event on Performance Tuning and Optimization – Part 2
    • June 15-19 (US$200 discount for registering in 2014)

We’ll likely have some classes in the second half of 2015 (details in Spring 2015) but this is it for the first half as we’re going to Australia to teach in February.

As you can see, we’re offering discounts off the early-bird price for all our 2015 classes if you register before the end of this year. The regular early-bird prices will apply from January 1st, 2015. If you’ve previously attended an Immersion Event, there’s a larger discount that’s always available to you whenever you register.

You can get all the logistical, registration, and curriculum details by drilling down from our main schedule page.

We hope to see you there!

My upcoming precon workshop at PASS and SQLintersection

The two major Fall conferences are 3-4 weeks away so I wanted to give you a heads-up about my new pre-con workshop that I’ve just finished putting together and will be presenting at both the PASS Summit in Seattle at the start of November, and again the following week at our own SQLintersection conference in Las Vegas.

It’s based on one of my favorite topics – wait statistics and using them for performance troubleshooting - and that was the topic of my Spotlight session at the PASS Summit last year, which ended up being the #1-rated session. I’m very passionate about helping people learn about wait statistics and how to use them *correctly* as an invaluable aid when troubleshooting performance problems in SQL Server. Last year I only had 90 minutes on the subject (although I ran 40 minutes over!) but this year I’ll have an entire day to expand into techniques for further troubleshooting, rather than just evaluating the wait and latch statistics themselves.

The no-frills title of the workshop is: Performance Troubleshooting Using Waits and Latches

Here’s the abstract:

One of the first things you should check when investigating performance issues are wait and latch statistics, as these can often point you in the right direction for further analysis. Unfortunately many people misinterpret what SQL Server is telling them and jump to conclusions about how to solve the problem – what is often called ‘knee-jerk performance tuning’. In this full-day workshop, you’ll learn how to investigate and interpret wait and latch statistics – practical techniques you can take home and start using immediately. You’ll also learn what a myriad of wait and latch types actually mean and how you can investigate lightly-documented types to gain insight into what causes them. Don’t waste time when it comes to performance troubleshooting; wait statistics are the fastest route to understanding your problems and this workshop will help you get there faster.

If you come along I promise you that you’ll learn a ton of really, really useful information and techniques – I’m looking forward to teaching it tremendously.

You can get more details about this year’s PASS Summit in Seattle, November 3-7 at this website.

You can get more details about this year’s Fall SQLintersection in Las Vegas, November 8-14 at this website.

Whichever conference you go to (or you could be crazy like a few people I know and do both!), I’m looking forward to meeting you and I hope to see you in my workshop!


Finding a table name from a page ID

This is a question that I was sent over email that I thought would make a good post, and I’m waiting to do a user group presentation in Australia at 2am, so this will keep me busy :-)

Imagine you come to work in the morning and notice that some new rows have been entered into the msdb.dbo.suspect_pages table during the night. Usually the first thing you’re going to do is run DBCC CHECKDB, but if your database is a few TB, that could be several hours before you know where the problem is, and which table may have lost data. You want to find out which table is involved as soon as possible so you can explore your disaster recovery options.

Another scenario is troubleshooting a poorly performing query workload, running my script to look at the currently waiting threads using sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks, seeing a lot of PAGELATCH_EX waits and needing to figure out which table is involved from the page ID in the resource_description column in the sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks output.

Going back to the first scenario, getting the data from the suspect_pages table is easy:

SELECT * FROM [msdb].[dbo].[suspect_pages];
database_id file_id     page_id              event_type  error_count last_update_date
----------- ----------- -------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------------------
6           1           295                  2           2           2014-09-25 01:18:22.910

Finding the table name requires first using DBCC PAGE. The syntax for DBCC PAGE is:

dbcc page ( {'dbname' | dbid}, filenum, pagenum [, printopt={0|1|2|3} ])

You can just use print option 0, as that just displays the page’s header. You also must enable trace flag 3604 to get any output from DBCC PAGE – it’s perfectly safe. So taking the values from our suspect_pages output, that gives us:

DBCC PAGE (6, 1, 295, 0);
PAGE: (1:295)


BUF @0x00000004FD8C7980

bpage = 0x00000004A2D14000          bhash = 0x0000000000000000          bpageno = (1:295)
bdbid = 6                           breferences = 0                     bcputicks = 0
bsampleCount = 0                    bUse1 = 55116                       bstat = 0x809
blog = 0x15ab215a                   bnext = 0x0000000000000000          


Page @0x00000004A2D14000

m_pageId = (1:295)                  m_headerVersion = 17                m_type = 17
m_typeFlagBits = 0x0                m_level = 0                         m_flagBits = 0x8200
m_objId (AllocUnitId.idObj) = 84    m_indexId (AllocUnitId.idInd) = 256
Metadata: AllocUnitId = 72057594043432960
Metadata: PartitionId = 72057594039042048                                Metadata: IndexId = 0
Metadata: ObjectId = 245575913      m_prevPage = (0:0)                  m_nextPage = (0:0)
pminlen = 8008                      m_slotCnt = 1                       m_freeCnt = 83
m_freeData = 8107                   m_reservedCnt = 0                   m_lsn = (35:200:9)
m_xactReserved = 0                  m_xdesId = (0:0)                    m_ghostRecCnt = 0
m_tornBits = 1093512791             DB Frag ID = 1                      

Allocation Status

GAM (1:2) = ALLOCATED               SGAM (1:3) = ALLOCATED
PFS (1:1) = 0x64 MIXED_EXT ALLOCATED 100_PCT_FULL                        DIFF (1:6) = CHANGED

We’re interested in the output beginning Metadata:. Those fields are not stored on the page itself. When I rewrote DBCC PAGE for SQL Server 2005, I added the Metadata: output to make it easier to find the object and index ID that the page is part of (as these used to be the m_objId and m_indexId fields in SQL Server 7.0 and 2000).

The Metadata: ObjectId field is what we want. If you see it is 99, then stop as that means the damaged page is part of the allocation system and not part of a table and you’ll need to wait for DBCC CHECKDB to complete to know the extent of the damage.

If you see the ObjectId is 0, that means there was no metadata found. This could be because:

  • The table that the page was part of has been deleted since the page corruption was logged
  • The system catalogs are corrupt in some way
  • The page is corrupt and so incorrect values were used to look up the metadata

In any case, you’ll need to wait for DBCC CHECKDB to complete to know the extent of the damage.

If the ObjectId is not 0 or 99, we can plug it into the OBJECT_NAME function to give us the name of the table:


If you get the result above, then there are two possibilities:

  1. You are in the wrong database context
  2. The metadata for the database is corrupt, so wait for DBCC CHECKDB to complete

It’s most likely #1 that’s the problem, at least in my experience with helping people out. You can get the database name by taking the database_id in the suspect_pages output and plugging it into the DB_NAME function. Go into the correct database context and try again.

USE [company];

So there you go – hope this helps!

PS1 Kenneth Fisher commented with some neat code that will do the job on 2012 and 2014 using the new sys.dm_db_database_page_allocations DMF – check it out. That will work as long as there aren’t any metadata or allocation bitmap corruptions.

PS2 Wayne Sheffield reminded me over email and in a comment that DBCC PAGE doesn’t need 3604 if you use the WITH TABLERESULTS option and programmatically crack the DBCC PAGE results.

Updated wait stats script for performance and 2014

Very short blog post to let you all know that I’ve updated my wait stats script so that it works on 2014 and also now runs very fast. If you’re using my script, please replace it with the new one.

Check it out on the original post: Wait statistics, or please tell me where it hurts.